AI, rated by the people who use it.

“If you ask anyone on the chatgpt subreddit, they would say claude is better. On the claude subreddit, all the top posts are about how bad claude is and why they have moved to codex.”

“I used to have both, paid plans. Cancelled Claude after repeatedly running out of available messages. Usage limits were horrendous and a deal breaker for me.”

“Ex GPT user - claudes attention to detail and quality of output in creating documents, is miles better.”

“Claude better for accuracy, professionalism. However, I still find GPT more creative when it comes to certain writing types. Use Claude for a contract, use Chat for writing a birthday card.”

“If you use the top models they are all the same shit now. It is like asking what type of bazooka is the best to blow something up, it is all marginal now.”

“I use GPT for my code and everyday use, then tell Claude to roast the shit out of the code while optimizing it.”

“I still use chat GPT for quick image generation and find its deep research to be better vs claude. Essentially Claude for coding, GPT for research and images.”

“chatGPT is better at doing all the tasks in a long prompt but Claude has more human outputs and better looking text and design.”

“Claude is not worse — it just fails differently. Claude = cleaner code, better explanations. ChatGPT = better at fixing weird bugs and tricky logic.”

“Claude is vastly superior when it comes to designing layout, frontend, UI/UX. I found codex to be more consistent for implementation tasks.”

“gpt is a yes-man, claude actually has taste. Tell it to act like a cynical silicon valley VC roasting your landing page. It absolutely destroyed my marketing copy, but the harsh truth actually made the product better.”

“Claude Code always shipped me 100% times a working code while Copilot you always had to fix like 10 times before it works with the same Opus Model.”