4.0
@hn_4d8058
about 2 months ago
I know I'll sound like a Google shill, but I really don't know how this could compete against what Google AI Studio offers for now. Studio even has free quota (while being completely opaque).
I once feel Kagi is some fresh air that we need for search engine. But now it seems to be more and more directly competing against the other LLM web summery products and imo Google/Gemini is light-seconds ahead in that space. The AI Overview is an ultra water downed version of it and it's still somewhat usable.
Perhaps this move is signaling that they'll be back focusing on search itself more though (I hope so).
2.0
@hn_d36767
about 2 months ago
They actually have two "studios"
Google AI Studio
and
Google Cloud Vertex AI Studio
And both have their own documentation, different ways of "tuning" the model.
Talk about shipping the org chart.
1.0
@hn_a08774
about 2 months ago
Google AI Studio documentation encourages developers to deploy vibecoded apps, claiming the API key is secure because it is protected by a proxy - however, there are no checks on the open proxy the deployed app exposes, which allows anyone to use the developer's wallet for arbitrary queries. Vulnerable live endpoints are discoverable by a single google search for us-west1.run.app . The proxy processes Gemini requests even if the deployed website has no AI features itself. Not even a documentation update 2.5 months after reporting.
2.5
@hn_ce8d0f
about 2 months ago
Google's AI Studio does not always seem to work well in Firefox. That is my only usage on Chrome. On top of some web application testing.
I used Google AI Studio instead of Google Gemini App because it provides references to the search results.
Google AI Studio gave me an exact answer of 2227 as a possible answer and linked to these comments because there is a comment further down which claims that is the exact answer. The comment was 2 hours old when I did the prompt.
It also provided a code example of how to find it using the python nfl data library mentioned in one of the comments here.